Explainer
Defines a concept using authoritative sources and worked examples. It does not claim that the concept predicts price.
WickAtlas aims to make authorship, evidence, dates, commercial interests and uncertainty visible. This page describes the minimum record required for publication and how that record is maintained.
WickAtlas is an independent, early-stage publisher. It does not yet have a standing external financial review board, a live market-data desk or first-hand experience of every product it covers. Until a named author and biography are attached, material is attributed to WickAtlas Editorial and must not imply professional credentials that have not been documented.
A page can pass one gate and fail another. Volatile subjects such as prop-firm rules, platform access and regulations receive a stated check date and need a new review when the source changes.
Answer a real trader question without manufacturing urgency
Identify the primary evidence and likely points of change
Separate sourced facts, calculation, interpretation and opinion
Check quotations, formulae, links, code and numerical examples
Record affiliate, author-position and provider relationships
Confirm scope, risk language, evidence label and limitations
Add byline status, dates, sources and a permanent page version
Monitor volatile claims and record material corrections
Defines a concept using authoritative sources and worked examples. It does not claim that the concept predicts price.
Shows a calculation or historical illustration. Inputs are visible and the result is not presented as a typical return.
Provides frozen rules worth testing. No performance conclusion is implied until a complete study is published.
A dated interpretation with bullish, bearish and no-trade branches. It is commentary, not an instruction to transact.
Summarises official provider material without claiming first-hand use, payout experience or regulatory approval.
Reserved for a documented product or programme test performed by the named reviewer. It cannot be inferred from desk research.
Named author where available; otherwise WickAtlas Editorial
No invented credentials or implied trading history
Original publication and last substantive review
A refreshed date requires an actual review
Direct links to material evidence, favouring primary sources
A source supports only the claim beside it
Explainer, hypothesis, observation, scenario or first-hand test
Language cannot outrun the evidence label
Provider, timestamp, market, timeframe and sample window
No live-data claim without a dependable feed
Affiliate relationship shown before the relevant link
Commission is not evidence of quality
Disclosed when AI materially helped draft or organise a page
AI output is not a source or reviewer
Material corrections and rule changes recorded in plain language
Do not silently rewrite the historical record
Central banks, statistical agencies, regulators, legislation, platform documentation and a provider's current programme terms are preferred for factual claims in their respective areas. Independent reporting can add context or identify a dispute, but it does not replace the controlling rule or original dataset.
Community posts and customer reviews can reveal questions worth investigating. They are experience reports, not proof that every customer will receive the same outcome. Anonymous claims are not upgraded into facts through repetition.
AI may help organise research, compare page structures, draft plain-language explanations or flag internal inconsistencies. It cannot serve as the authority for a market fact, provider rule, legal statement, quotation or performance number.
Material AI assistance should be disclosed on the page or in its publication record. A responsible human editor must check the cited sources and final claims before release. If that review has not happened, the content should remain a draft.
A commercial relationship is stated before the relevant call to action. Non-affiliate alternatives remain eligible for coverage, and commission size is not a ranking input. A review must describe material drawbacks even when WickAtlas may earn from a qualifying referral.
Provider-supplied claims are attributed to the provider. Promotional statistics are not presented as independently verified unless WickAtlas has obtained and checked sufficient underlying evidence.
A factual error that was wrong when published is corrected in place with a correction date and a description proportionate to its importance. A provider rule that later changes receives a dated version update when the original page accurately reflected the source at publication.
Minor spelling and formatting fixes do not require a formal note. Changes that alter the conclusion, risk, eligibility, cost, legal status or commercial relationship do.